The Laws of Context

How Does Context Work in Historical Study?

Definition of Outside and Inside Knowledge: Context is an odd concept as, in this case, it covers outside knowledge as well as inside knowledge. Therefore, I will speak of it in terms of both concepts. Outside knowledge is information about a later or earlier period in relation to the studied period, whereas inside knowledge is information specifically from the studied period.

***

Why do we call things irrelevant? Because they go against the laws of context. Why do we call things relevant? Because they obey the laws of context. Let me explain. ‘Context’ is a term of which I feel many individuals, unfortunately, forget the importance. In fact, Dr. J. Scott Duvall and Dr. J. Daniel Hays state that ‘context determines meaning’[1]; I am inclined to agree with them, for how can one interpret anything truly without knowledge of context? Why would we, for example, assume that an individual living in Jerusalem in the 1st century AD would not know of the modern concept of feminism? If we assumed that this individual knew of the modern concept of feminism, then we would be committing a crime against the laws of context. While this seems obvious, I cannot stress its importance enough. Context is something we keep in mind when making improvements on a previous context (such as science, ethics, etc – there is a reason why we no longer live in the feudal system), a lens with which we read or interpret information, etc. Without context, nothing has meaning.

For example, if I said that an event happened in the year 1195, I have immediately set up a context that we cannot use our modern perspective to equate to, either historically or culturally. When anyone sets up a context, certain laws that define that context are non-vocally stated, hence why we can call certain things relevant or irrelevant. Concerning the year 1195, its context does not involve governmental sciences that stem from the Magna Carta, as this document will not be signed for another twenty years; this context also means that there is no idea of unalienable human rights, as documents that include these concepts such as expressed in the United States have not been created as of yet; this context includes that there have been no revolutionary influences that sparked the Enlightenment in Europe, for that is a good six hundred years afterwards. These are only some of the laws of context I have put in place by mentioning the year 1195. Without knowledge of any of a context’s laws, then one can never come to any form of understanding about that context’s period. The same works for any other time in history.

However, to even establish laws of context there need to be other contexts that must be understood beforehand. For example, I would not be able to say that the year 1195 was twenty years before the Magna Carta without knowing the context of the Magna Carta. In this way, context encapsulates its period and yet all other periods at the same time; this is why I can speak of the year 1195 and yet mention concepts such as human rights. I am not looking upon them as if within the same historical or cultural period, for that would go against the laws of context, but I am using one to help myself gain a contextual glimpse of another. Who knew that knowing about the beginnings of human rights would help the beginnings of one’s understanding of the year 1195?! As Mortimer states, ‘W.H. Auden once suggested that to understand your own country you need to have lived in at least two others. One can say something similar to periods of time: to understand your own century you need to have come to terms with at least two others.’[2] In this way, one uses outside knowledge (eg: rights of man not yet established) in order to begin to create an understanding of the studied context (inside knowledge).

This is how context does not just, obviously, span the entirety of human history, it additionally works together with other contexts that may not seem at first to be related. As Hays and Duvall state: ‘context determines meaning’.


[1] Duvall & Hays, Grasping God’s Word: A Hands-on Approach to Reading and Applying the Bible. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012) 149.
[2] Ian Mortimer, A Time Traveller’s Guide to Medieval England (London, UK: Vintage Books, 2009) 5.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Re-enactor's Hurdle

Censorship